Skip to main content

Mandatory Reporting and Review of the Use of a TASER by an Officer

WHEREAS, the TASER gun is supposedly a non-lethal electronic stun gun used by law enforcement officers to, among other things, temporarily disable suspects and unarmed citizens, with reduced incidence of injury and death; and

WHEREAS, according to the TASER gun's manufacturer, TASER International, more than seven thousand (7,000) police departments in the United Sates have purchased TASER guns; and


WHEREAS, the number of law enforcement officers and correctional facilities using TASER guns is rapidly growing; and


WHEREAS, since the introduction of the TASER gun to law enforcement agencies, it has been used on school children, mentally disabled individuals, elderly people, pregnant women, inmates, individuals with a variety of pre- existing medical conditions and restrained individuals; and


WHEREAS, an increasingly growing body of evidence has linked the use of TASER guns to serious injuries and deaths; and


WHEREAS, by some accounts, over 360 people have died in North America after having been tasered; and


WHEREAS, because of deaths and injuries, there is considerable debate regarding its safety, moreover it is increasingly clear that pre-existing medical conditions, officer misuse or other factors impact the rise in injuries and deaths; and


WHEREAS, police departments in several states, including Florida, Ohio, Colorado, Oregon and Illinois have either suspended or restricted the use of TASER guns by law enforcement officers; and


WHEREAS, the leading manufacturer of TASER guns, TASER INTERNATIONAL has now issued a twelve (12) page bulletin to law enforcement agencies nationwide with warnings advising officers not to shoot subjects in the chest in order to reduce the chances of liability should cardiac arrest result; and


WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in Bryan v. McPherson, et al has concluded that there is no constitutionally defensible justification for the use of TASER in the absence of an immediate threat to law enforcement or others.


THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the NAACP reaffirms its 2005 TASER Ban resolution; and


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the NAACP advocates state and federal governments to establish through executive order or legislative process mandatory reporting and review requirements for data analysis and the creation of impact statements, which will include:

  • Evaluation of tasered subjects by certified medical personnel;
  • Reporting, review and advisory recommendation by police administration and citizen review boards of compiled data and the circumstances surrounding the TASER usage;
  • Reporting of the race, age and sex of each officer that tasers a person; and
  • Reporting of the race, age and sex of the subject tasered.


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be distributed to Law Enforcement Training Programs, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, NOBEL, the National Sheriffs' Association, the Government Training Institute for Law Enforcement, the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, and to all NAACP units for distribution to local and state law enforcement training programs.

Together Power Vote Hero - NAACP

Are you ALL IN?

NAACP is going ALL IN because democracy is on the ballot and only we, the people, have the power to protect it. Rush a donation now to fuel our critical voter turnout efforts!